Home Blog Page 529

Noise Reduction In Control Valve – V. Murugappan, Sethumadhavan Vittal

Abstract
In an industrial plant, it is important to restrict noise. It can cause irritation and prolonged exposure to higher decibles can be fatal. OSHA standard defines and regulates noise in equipment’s. Also each instrument has its own noise limitation. However, after all these limitations in a plant the average noise exceeds the limit human ear can bear. Control valve noise is a big concern for plant operators and can cause the plant to stop and reduce profitability. Noise cannot be nullified in a valve but can be reduced to a great extent that plant operators can bear. Use of steam is common in these power, refinery or fertilizer industries and other processes. If there is more process drop in a process, one needs to pay more attention on noise attenuation. In control valve when noise attenuation technique is carried out we need to ensure the process controllability of valve is also not disturbed. By reducing the noise the plant efficiency and life span of valve can also be increased. This paper determines the different methods that can be used to limit the control valve noise for ensuring the safety for plant and its workers. Noise can be treated by source treatment or path treatment. Source treatment is method of reducing the generation of noise and path treatment is method of reducing the noise after generation from valve trim to outlet of the pipe.

Introduction
As defined by OSHA, noise level for control Valves is to be limited to 85 dBA for gaseous service which is aerodynamic noise. For liquid service there is no such limitation since sonic velocity of gas is very high when compared to liquid.
ISA 75.17 defines aerodynamic noise generated in valve. As a method to predict the noise generated in a control valve of standard design by the flow of compressible fluid and the resulting noise outside of the pipe i.e. downstream of the valve. The transmission loss (TL) equations are based on a rigorous analysis of the interaction between the sound waves that exist in the pipe and many coincidence frequencies in the pipe wall. The pipe wall thickness reduces the noise by increasing the thickness. The equations in this standard make use of the valve sizing factors defined in ANSI/ISA-S75.01 and ANSI/ISA-S75.02. This method was developed from the fundamental principles of acoustics, fluid mechanics, and mechanics. IEC 60534-8-4:2015 establishes a method to predict the noise generated in valve by liquid flow and the resulting noise level measured downstream of the valve. The noise may be generated both by normal turbulence and by liquid cavitation in the valve. Pressure is an important parameter for noise calculation, the pressure in the vena contracta is developed from the definition of FL which is referred in ANSI/ISA-S75.01.
A control valve controls flow by converting pressure energy into kinetic energy. Some of this energy is transferred to the pipe wall as vibration, and a portion of this is radiated as noise. Most of the energy is converted to heat through viscous friction. At the vena contracta there is a pressure that may be even lower than the downstream pressure. The different regimes of noise generation are the result of differing sonic phenomena or reactions between the molecules in the gas and the sonic shock cells. In Regime I, flow is subsonic and the gas pressure is partially recovered or recompressed. In Regime II, sonic flow exists, with interaction between shock cells and with turbulent choked flow mixing. Pressure recovery is less as the limit of Regime II is approached. In Regime III no isentropic pressure recovery takes place. In Regime IV the shock cell structure diminishes as a “Mach disk” is formed. In Regime V there is a constant acoustic efficiency. ISA 75.07 defines equipment, methods, and procedures for the laboratory testing and measurement of airborne sound radiated by a compressible fluid flowing through a control valve and its associated piping, including fixed-flow restrictions.
Detailed Analysis
Source treatment is killing the noise in its origin which is generally valve trim and distributing pressure drop in valve port area by using low noise trims. Noise reduction trim are used for reducing the noise production in valves. In gaseous service there are specialized cages with mini holes which distribute the pressure loss in an evenly manner, the number and distance between holes are determined with respect to the amount of pressure loss to be distributed. Noise calculation in valve is made at valve outlet and also at 3m from valve outlet. For liquid service since the sonic velocity is less when compared to gas service, the limitation for liquid service is approximately 100 dBA and for the same anti cavitation cage is used for limiting the noise with same distribution of pressure loss principle. In liquid service mainly cavitation causes noise which is bursting of bubbles caused with respect to vapor pressure relation. Other effects like flashing and choking are very minimal contributors for noise. Valve characteristics recommended for control valve are either linear or equal percentage and when it is low noise trim then characteristics would be modified linear or modified equal percentage. We need to ensure that the controllability of the process is not disturbed.
For service where specialized cages cannot limit the noise, we can use path treatment which is reduction of noise after generation and in outlet of valve. In that case, diffuser is used which is distribution of pressure loss with enlarged space above the line size for reducing both noise and velocity.
For vent service in which process is vented out to atmosphere, pressure loss is enormous and in such cases silencer is used which is similar to a diffuser. However, even after use of silencer, noise generated during vent out will be approximately close to 110 dBA it is acceptable since venting does not happen often. In service where heat dissipation is not allowed in order to maintain process fluid nature as it is, insulation of line along with valves are offered. Insulation is also used if above discussed noise limitation parameters are not effective so that every meter of insulation thickness reduces approximately 3 dBA of noise. If pressure loss i.e. difference between inlet and outlet is enormous, the pressure loss can be split into two or three valves so that noise generation can be reduced. However, this option increases the cost of procurement since quantity of valve is increased. As process flow cause noise with pressure difference all the instruments that causes noise generation should have noise limiting ability like control valve does. Apart from instrumentation other mechanical items like pumps and flow equipments should have options to limit noise generation. Velocity is also very important, as it is related to noise and for gas which Mach is greater than 0.33 would have noise greater than 85dBA. Pipe schedule increase is another step for reduction in noise, as thickness of pipe wall would also reduce the amount of noise exposed out of pipe line.
Reduction of noise in a valve is not effective if multiple valves are placed together the average noise will be high due to cumulative effect of noise. For rotating equipments for which noise generated is very high they will be normally placed inside a room, however for plant operators who needs to work near those instruments will be using PPE and same would reduce the noise to a limited extent and not fully. Similarly, valves for anti-surge application, pressure reducing desuperheater can be placed with wall covered for noise prevention. For the same, plants are located in remote location away from residential area. Also with respect to growing population circumference of residential area is extended keeping the industrial area in mind. Plant operators who are exposed to noise for prolonged period are more prone to the hazards. This has to be minimized by conducting medical awareness program to workers. Instruments location is very important and more noise generating instruments should be located separately. So that, cumulative noise generation can be avoided. Every plant should have insulation by default to limit the noise, irrespective of requirement of heat dissipation.
Conclusion
Noise generation in a valve cannot be nullified.However, it can be reduced by above described methods and in future more advanced methods of noise reduction would be introduced. For controlling the process as desired we need to choose to reduce noise to avoid process disturbance and also to provide safety to plant operators. In design stage, if we focus more on reducing noise perspective like process reducing; dropping pressure step by step, civil functions providing additional supports for reducing vibrations and reducing sudden change in pipe orientation by using curved pipe design and control system opting for optimum source or path treatment for noise application in control valve is more efficient and productive. Noise limitation should be followed strictly throughout the plant with norms same seriousness as that of carbon emission, waste treatment plant that are controlled by pollution control board as noise is also pollution.
Standards:
1. OSHA -1910.95- Occupational noise exposure
2. ISA 75.17- Control Valve aerodynamic noise prediction
3. IEC 60534-8-4:2015 Industrial process control valves
4. ISA 75.01 Control Valve sizing
5. ISA 75.07 Laboratory measurement of noise

Waters new ACQUITY UPLC PLUS Series

Waters Corporation recently announced the introduction of the ACQUITY UPLC PLUS Series.

Three new ACQUITY UltraPerformance LC™ (UPLC™) Systems that build off of the success of Waters’ industry-leading ACQUITY UPLC separations platform.
Waters designed the new ACQUITY UPLC H-Class PLUS, H-Class PLUS Bio, and I-Class PLUS Systems. These are for unparalleled flexibility, performance, and ease-of-use. Academic, pharmaceutical, food, and chemical industry laboratories use ACQUITY UPLC. This is to meet their research, development and quality control objectives.

ACQUITY UPLC PLUS

The ACQUITY UPLC H-Class PLUS and H-Class PLUS BioSystems are quaternary UPLC systems. Also, they are designed for high-resolution, high-sensitivity separations of complex samples with the flexibility and robustness to run all modes of chromatography namely:–

  1. ion exchange
  2. size exclusion
  3. hydrophilic interaction
  4. hydrophobic interaction
  5. reversed phase

Also, it is independent of the type or size chromatographic column particle the method specifies. In addition, these systems are especially well-suited as an inlet to mass spectrometry, for streamlined method development, and for routine analysis laboratories running HPLC, UHPLC or UPLC analytical methods.

Furthermore, the ACQUITY UPLC I-Class PLUS System is a binary UPLC system. It is designed to generate ultra-efficient, narrow peaks and to improve the sensitivity of optical detection or mass spectrometry. With industry-leading, ultra-low dispersion and delay volumes, it is an ideal system for laboratories seeking the highest chromatographic resolution and productivity possible in a UPLC system.

In addition, the ACQUITY UPLC H-Class PLUS, H-Class PLUS Bio, and I-Class PLUS replace the Waters ACQUITY UPLC H-Class, ACQUITY UPLC H-Class Bio and ACQUITY UPLC I-Class Systems in Waters product line. So, the foundational enhancements made to the ACQUITY UPLC PLUS Series will not affect the analytical results for well-established, validated LC methods developed with the ACQUITY UPLC H-Class, H-Class Bio and I-Class Systems.

Finally, for laboratories that wish to extend the lifecycle of their investment in previously-installed systems, Waters is offering ACQUITY UPLC PLUS Series Usability and Performance Enhancement Kits.

For more details, contact:

Dayamani Santosh
Waters India Pvt Ltd.
Phone: 080-49292200-03
Fax: 080-49292204
Mobile: 9632786899
Email: dayamani_santosh@waters.com
Website: www.waters.com

Silicon – High-tech element of the information age

First, we had the stone age. Then came the bronze age, followed by the iron age. And now, we’re in the information age. Or rather, from the ‘chemistry’ perspective, we could well say, we’re now in the silicon age.

Silicon defines the lifestyles of modern times. Today, silicon chips, those tiny electronic brains, are all over the place. From gadgets like television sets and microwave ovens in our homes to laptops, smartphones, stereos, cars, traffic signals, and solar panels, none of the sophisticated devices we use today could have been made without one common element – silicon. Meaning, silicon not only forms the backbone of the electronics industry, helped us replace bulky main-frame computers with sleek laptops and tablets, made high-speed communications possible, it has transformed our very life today in astonishing ways. Silicon plays such a key role in our world today, it has a whole high-tech region named after it – Silicon Valley!

History of silicon

Appearing just below carbon and above germanium in the periodic table, silicon is among the more common of Earth’s elements, being the second most abundant element after oxygen. Silicon dioxide (SiO2) or silica, silicon’s most common compound that is the principal constituent of soft white sands on our beaches, makes up around 75% of the Earth’s crust. It is a major component of other silicates too like quartzite and granite and is also found in quartz, rock crystal, amethyst, agate, flint, jasper, and opal.

Though silica may be the most abundant compound in the Earth’s crust, elemental silicon is hardly ever found in nature and people were not aware of its existence until the nineteenth century. However, humans have been using silicon compounds for millennia. For example, ancient civilizations used flint, a form of quartz, for making tools for hunting and everyday use. And when they built their clay huts or erected sandstone temples, they made use of silicon compounds.

In 1789, French chemist Antoine Lavoisier was the first to propose that a new chemical element that was very abundant could be present in quartz. Also, many scientists made attempts to isolate silicon from various materials. English scientist Sir Humphry Davy, who had developed a technique for separating elements from their compounds by melting these and passing an electric current through them, succeeded in separating elemental sodium, potassium, calcium, and some other elements for the first time. But he couldn’t separate silicon.

In 1824, Swedish chemist Jöns Jacob Berzelius, who also discovered cerium, selenium, and thorium, heated potassium chips with potassium fluorosilicate, thoroughly washed away the residual by-products and succeeded in separating a brown powder – the amorphous allotrope of silicon. He named the new element silicium, deriving it from the Latin word for flint – silex. Today, elemental silicon is produced on a large scale by heating silica with carbon.

Silicon was given its present name by Scottish chemist Thomas Thomson in 1831. Retaining a part of Berzelius’s name, he changed the ending to ‘on’ since the new element was more similar to the nonmetals boron and carbon than to metals such as calcium and magnesium. And since then the name of the newly discovered element came to be accepted as silicon.

In 1854, French chemist Henri Deville became the first to isolate crystalline silicon. He electrolyzed an impure melt of sodium aluminium chloride to produce aluminium silicide and then washed away the aluminium with water to obtain silicon crystals.

A fascinating chemistry

At first, scientists debated whether silicon could be classified as a metal or nonmetal. The concept of semiconductors being unknown at that time, they were unaware that silicon was an excellent example of one. While Berzelius believed it was a metal, Sir Humphry Davy thought it was a nonmetal. The main reason for this difference of opinion was that the new element was a better conductor of electricity than nonmetals, but not such a good conductor as metals.

As it was later discovered, silicon is neither a metal nor a nonmetal. It is a metalloid, an element that looks metallic but conducts electricity only under certain conditions. It is a semiconductor, meaning its electrical conductivity lies somewhere between that of metals and insulators. In the case of silicon, like other semiconductors, its conductivity gets better when its temperature is increased, but this can be further enhanced by the addition of minute amounts of elements such as arsenic, phosphorus, boron, gallium or germanium through a process known as doping. In fact, it is this characteristic of silicon, combined with its abundant availability that has been exploited to make it the element that ultimately ushered in the Information Age.

The rich chemistry of silicon continues to fascinate researchers, and new discoveries about this easily available element continue to surface. Single crystals of crystalline silicon can be grown through what is known as the Czochralski process. When doped with suitable elements like those mentioned earlier these crystals are then used in the manufacture of electronic devices, like microchips, transistors, and solar cells.

When ancient Egyptians used sand bed filters for purifying water, they were actually using sand grains as nanoparticles that had nano-sized spaces between them; the finer the sand, the better was the level of filtration. The amazing fact is that although the surface area of 1 g of sand particles may be extremely small, the area of their internal surface area could exceed 1,000 sq. metres! When such particles with ordered nanopores are synthesized in the presence of surfactant templates, this creates countless opportunities for the development of nanomaterials. For example, nanoporous silica-based particles are now being used for catalysis, separations, environmental purification, drug delivery, and nanotechnology.

Today, silicon chips that form the core of modern electronic devices and computing, are acknowledged to be some of the most complex devices ever manufactured, requiring high-tech manufacturing technology. According to a poll carried out in 2004 by CNN.com in which over one lakh people participated, the silicon chip was voted as the most revolutionary invention of the last 50 years. The World Wide Web and the Personal Computer were ranked second and third respectively – for both of which, silicon is the element we have to thank.

Nowadays, optical glass produced from silicon is used for manufacturing both optical fibres and liquid crystal displays. Silicon is also a vital element for the photovoltaic industries. Solar panels made from silicon produce electricity for domestic and industrial use besides powering remote telecommunications, weather, and irrigation infrastructure.

Silicones, that is, silicon-based polymers, are proving to be a smart alternative to environmentally harmful hydrocarbon-based products. In addition, though it is widely known that such polymers are used for making breast implants, we also unknowingly and routinely use them in everyday items ranging from lubricants and fabric softeners to haircare products and antiperspirants.

In 2006, scientists succeeded in creating a computer chip that melded silicon components with brain cells, making it possible for electrical signals from the brain cells to be transmitted to the silicon components of the chip, and vice versa. Their objective is to eventually create electronic devices for treating neurological disorders.

Despite silicon’s most important application today being in the manufacture of electronic equipment, the total quantity of silicon used for manufacturing such devices is relatively small. The bulk of silicon produced is used for making metal alloys that have numerous applications including in the automobile, glass, and construction industries.

Another interesting discovery is the large-scale formation of silica structures with nanoscale precision by different types of marine organisms. Studies of this naturally occurring ‘biosilification’ process could be the basis for the development of environmentally benign processes for making innovative silicon-based materials, ultimately leading to advances in the field now known as ‘silicon biotechnology’.

In other words, since its discovery around two centuries ago, silicon still continues to amaze us.

What next?

We are told that silicon microprocessors are beginning to show some worrying signs and that for all its flexibility and other beneficial qualities, silicon itself could be a part of the problem. The latest silicon chips are producing more heat than silicon can dissipate fast enough. As a result, microprocessors are unable to run at their full potential speed without melting.

So, are we moving towards a new age? Which material will replace silicon and define this next age? We may not have the answers yet, but experts are of the view that novel energy-efficient materials are necessary for supporting the future growth of micro-electronics. But till then, whether combined with other elements in numerous compounds, in ultrapure elemental form for electronic devices, or in newer forms, silicon will continue to be a vital part of our lives.

References

1. Mietek Jaroniec: Silicon beyond the valley – Nature Chemistry, 1 May 2009
2. Jefferson Lab: The element silicon – https://education.jlab.org/itselemental/ele014.html
3. Stephanie Pappas: Facts about silicon – Live Science, 16 September 2014
4. Chemicool.com: Silicon – 9 October 2012, https://www.chemicool.com/elements/silicon.html
5. CNN.com: Silicon chip ‘most important invention’ – 31 December 2004, http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/12/27/explorers.silicon/index.html
6. Tessel Renzenbrink: Beyond the Silicon Age – Elektor Magazine, 19 September 2017
7. Los Alamos National Laboratory: Periodic table of elements – Silicon – http://periodic.lanl.gov/14.shtml

 

Chemical Industry Digest- Mar 18

Articles covered in this issue:

Advances in Catalysis in Recent Times
B. Viswanathan, former faculty of IIT – Chennai
In this article, the author discusses new developments in the field of catalysis and elaborates on challenges in catalysis for different processes for better productivity.

Make the Most of Automation Upgrade
John Dolenc, Emerson Process Management
This article enlightens on how to make the best of automation upgrades in the process industry. He also discusses the common mistakes to be avoided that undermine projects.

Tips for Quick Approvals of New Ideas
Raghava Chari – Independent Consultant
New Ideas are what drives innovation as well as incremental improvements. But the human tendency is always to resist changes and hence new ideas too. The article suggests ways to get quick approval of new ideas and how to implement them soonest and derive the required satisfaction are covered.

Ultrasonic Multipath Flow Meters – A promising new entrant in Custody Transfer applications
Raghava Chari
This article highlights the features of Ultrasonic Multipath Flow Meters which are accurate and minimizes losses of crude during transfer of crude from carrier to the buyer.

Radar Tank Level Gauge Systems
Raghava Chari
Radar Technology based tank level gauges have advanced and proved itself, such that they can replace others like capacitance, float systems, custody transfer applications and tank farm management, etc. This article discusses their working principles, and factors that affect the accuracy of radar level gauges.

Subscribe Now

Irène Joliot-Curie (1897 – 1956)

When Irène Joliot-Curie and her husband Frédéric were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1935 “in recognition of their synthesis of new radioactive elements”, Irène created Nobel history of sorts. She became the only Nobel Prize awardee in any discipline whose parents (Marie and Pierre Curie in her case) and husband were also Nobel Laureates. Not to mention that the Curies have the most number of Nobel Prizes than any other family in world history.

Carrying on the legacy of scientific work, both Irène Joliot-Curie’s children went on to excel in the scientific field, her daughter Hélène becoming a renowned physicist and son, Pierre growing up to be a noted biologist.

Moreover, like her illustrious parents, Irène and her husband Frédéric were not just life partners, they were successful lab partners as well, emerging as the first to discover artificial radioactivity by synthesizing radioactive elements in the laboratory. The elements they discovered are being used till today to save millions of lives worldwide.

Actually, Irène and Frédéric narrowly missed winning the Nobel Prize on two earlier occasions. During their initial experiments, they had identified both the positron – the antimatter counterpart of the electron, and the neutron – the missing particle of atomic nuclei whose existence Rutherford had predicted in the early 1920s. Unfortunately, they did not interpret their research results correctly and failed to catch on to the implications of what they had discovered. Later, James Chadwick was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1935 for his discovery of the neutron in 1932, and Carl David Anderson who discovered the positron in 1932 won the Nobel prize in Physics in 1936.

The positive fallout of these near misses, however, was that their further research led them to discover manmade radioactivity and be honoured with a Nobel Prize in Chemistry, though unfortunately, this recognition came a year after Marie Curie had passed away.

Growing up influenced by science

Irène Curie was born on 12 September 1897 in Paris after Marie went into labour one month before time following an exhausting bicycle ride she and Pierre had taken into the countryside. When her father Pierre met with a sudden tragic accident, Irène was just eight years old. A few years later, she lost her beloved grandpa, Dr. Eugène Curie, who had introduced her to the sciences and also taught her to love nature, poetry, and radical politics.

Less than three years after Pierre’s untimely death in 1906, disappointed by the existing education system in Paris, Marie joined hands with a few of her academic colleagues at the Sorbonne to set up a unique schooling arrangement for their children called ‘The Cooperative’. In this special school, each of the academics taught the children, a group of ten including Irène, in their own homes. That was how the young Irène came to be educated by eminent scientists and scholars. She was taught physics by Marie Curie, chemistry by Jean Baptiste Perrin who was later awarded a Nobel Prize in physics, and mathematics by the renowned physicist Paul Langevin.

Though the informal school was dissolved within two years, it had a deep impact on Irène. Besides, Marie made sure that Irène and her younger daughter Ève (who later became a well-known pianist and journalist) were physically strong and exercised regularly at home. She also encouraged them to engage in horse riding, hiking, swimming, skiing, and gymnastics.

In 1911, the 14-year-old Irène accompanied her mother to Stockholm, Sweden to watch her being honoured with her second Nobel Prize, this time in Chemistry. She resumed and completed her schooling in Paris in a regular school and then in 1914, at the age of 17, she joined the Faculty of Science at the Sorbonne for college studies which were interrupted by the breaking out of World War I that same year.

Though still a teenager, she took up a nursing course even as she continued with her college studies, and then served as a nurse radiographer during the war, teaching radiology to other nurses and doctors on the war front and helping her mother operate mobile X-ray units for locating shrapnel in the bodies of wounded soldiers so their wounds could be diagnosed and treated correctly. As nurse radiographers, both Marie and Irène were exposed to large amounts of radiation, leading to both of them eventually dying from the consequences of such toxic exposure.

After the war ended, Irène completed her graduation degree in mathematics and physics at the Sorbonne. Now aged 21, she became her mother’s laboratory assistant at the Radium Institute founded by her. Here, she earned the nickname “crown princess” perhaps partly because many were jealous of her privileged position as the daughter of the Director of the Institute. Others felt intimidated by her in-depth knowledge of physics and mathematics, her robust physique, and her forthright way of interacting with others without bothering about ladylike mannerisms.

Following in the footsteps of Marie and Pierre, the Joliot-Curies too refused to patent their work deciding to make it freely available to the global scientific community. However, fears of their research being misused for military purposes, made them place all their documentation on nuclear fission in the vaults of the French Academy of Sciences in 1939, where it remained till 1949.

Soul mates, life partners, and fellow Nobel Laureates

Irène earned her doctoral degree in 1925, her thesis focusing on the alpha particles emitted by polonium, the element her parents had discovered. Soon after, on the recommendation of Paul Langevin, who was Irène’s major doctoral professor at the Sorbonne University, Marie hired Frédéric Joliot as her new assistant at the Radium Institute. Joliot was a first-class engineering graduate who had accepted a research scholarship.

In the beginning, Irène trained Frédéric in laboratory techniques required for radiochemical research. But gradually, the two of them discovered their many shared interests that besides science, included sports, humanism, the arts, and similar political views as well. Realising they had found their soul mates in each other, they got married a year later in October 1926. Irène was then 29 and Fred 27. Soon after marriage, they adopted the surname Joliot-Curie, though they often signed their scientific papers as Irène Curie and Frédéric Joliot.

Speaking about Irène, Frédéric said that though some regarded her as “a block of ice”, he had found in her “an extraordinary person, sensitive and poetic, who in many things gave the impression of being a living replica of what her father had been.” He had added that in Pierre’s daughter, he had discovered the “same purity, his good sense, and humility” that he had read about.

Achievements and Recognitions

From 1928 onwards, Irène and Frédéric collaborated on carrying out research on atomic nuclei. Till then, scientists knew that a nucleus could be split into stable parts when bombarded with a powerful enough particle. Notwithstanding their failure to correctly identify the positron and neutron that they had detected, what they ultimately discovered proved to be ground-breaking.

In 1934, when the Joliot-Curies bombarded a thin piece of aluminium with alpha particles, they discovered an unknown kind of radiation that persisted even after the source of radiation was removed. They found this was because aluminium atoms had been changed into a radioactive isotope of phosphorus. That is, by irradiating a natural, stable isotope of aluminium, they had artificially created a radioactive element – an unstable isotope of phosphorous. They found they could also similarly create radioactive isotopes of nitrogen from boron, and of silicon from magnesium. Their amazing discovery rightly won them the Nobel Prize the following year and resulted in further research on the fission of heavy metals, impacting the fields of chemistry, medicine, and biology.

Irène and Frédéric’s work on artificially synthesized, radioactive isotopes forms the basis of a lot of biomedical research and cancer treatment methods today like for example the use of radioactive iodine therapy for thyroid cancer. Their pioneering work also led to the discovery of the fission of uranium and the creation of powerful weapons of war.

The Nobel Prize got Irène Joliot-Curie a professorship at the Sorbonne’s Faculty of Science, while Frédéric was appointed as a Professor at the College of France. In 1936, the French Government appointed Irène as Undersecretary of State for Scientific Research, following which she helped in founding the National Centre of Scientific Research. In 1946, she became the Director of her mother’s Radium Institute.

Besides scientific work, Irène was also actively involved in social and political movements including the Suffragette movement. She was a member of the National Committee of the Union of French Women and the World Peace Council and actively supported the education and intellectual advancement of women. She and her husband were also made officials of the French Legion of Honour. Besides, Irène was a member of many international academies and scientific societies and was conferred with honorary doctor’s degrees by several universities.

Following in the footsteps of Marie and Pierre, the Joliot-Curies too refused to patent their work deciding to make it freely available to the global scientific community. However, fears of their research being misused for military purposes, made them place all their documentation on nuclear fission in the vaults of the French Academy of Sciences in 1939, where it remained till 1949.

Irène and Frédéric have been honoured by having the Royal Society of Chemistry’s annual Joliot-Curie Conference on diversity in science named after them. In 1991, the Joliot-Curie crater on Venus was named after Irène. The crater Joliot on the moon is named after Frédéric.

Also, the Sorbonne University honored Irène by introducing the annual Irène Joliot-Curie Prize awarded to a noteworthy “Woman Scientist of the Year”.

Finally, after years of exposure to radioactive materials, Irène Joliot-Curie succumbed to leukaemia like her mother and breathed her last at the Curie Hospital in Paris on 17 March 1956 at the age of 58. Two years later, Frédéric too passed away in Paris on 14 August, also at the age of 58.

Paying a tribute to Irène and Frédéric, the Nobel Prize Committee in its presentation speech in 1935 had mentioned: “The results of your researches are of capital importance for pure science, but in addition, physiologists, doctors, and the whole of suffering humanity hope to gain from your discoveries, remedies of inestimable value.” That has been proved to be no exaggeration.

References

  1. Nobelprize.org. Nobel Media AB 2014: Irène Joliot-Curie – Biographical – https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1935/joliot-curie-bio.html
  2. Nobelprize.org. Nobel Media AB 2014: Irène Joliot-Curie – Facts – https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1935/joliot-curie-facts.html
  3. Famous Scientists: Irène Joliot-Curie – https://www.famousscientists.org/irene-joliot-curie/
  4. Encyclopaedia Britannica: Frédéric and Irène Joliot-Curie – https://www.britannica.com/biography/Frederic-and-Irene-Joliot-Curie
  5. Sarah-Jane Cousins: Irène Joliot-Curie – 175 Faces of Chemistry, June 2014, http://www.rsc.org/diversity/175-faces/all-faces/irene-joliot-curie
  6. Science History Institute: Irène Joliot-Curie and Frédéric Joliot – https://www.sciencehistory.org/historical-profile/irene-joliot-curie-and-frederic-joliot
  7. Penny J. Gilmer: A Nobel Laureate in Artificial Radioactivity – Celebrating the 100th Anniversary of Madame Marie Sklodowska Curie’s Nobel Prize in Chemistry, Chiu, M. H., Gilmer, P. J., Treagust, D. F. (Eds.), Springer, 2011

 

 

Chemingineering | No Requiem for Plastics


This month our columnist examines the many advantages and applications of plastics and explains why its recycle is not easy. The recent Plastic Ban by Maharashtra Government lowers the esteem of the chemical industry and it has to fight back through improved product stewardship to promote responsible use of plastics. Genetically engineered bioplastics maybe a long-term sustainable solution.

I am writing this piece on GudiPadva day when the “Plastic Ban” announced by the Government of Maharashtra was supposed to take effect. The chief villain in this act is the ubiquitous plastic carry bag, a thing of great convenience and much utility. Polyethylene, out of which most carry bags are made, was accidentally synthesized by a German scientist in 1898. It took another 60 years before we could find suitable applications for this “plastic”. High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE), the mainstay of the plastic bags, was first produced only in 1953 and the first patent was awarded in 1965 for the “T-shirt plastic bag”, a design that essentially has remained the same till today. The first plastic grocery bag made its appearance in American supermarkets only in 1979. People were slow to switch from paper to plastic. The tipping point came when supermarkets started giving them away free, in hindsight perhaps a big mistake.

Most plastic products have a short useful life and are not recycled. Since plastics will take 400 years to degrade, the problem is poised to escalate exponentially. The prediction that by mid-century, the oceans will contain more plastic waste than fish, ton for ton, has become one of the most-quoted scary statistics to galvanize us into action.

Problem

This year we will use 5 trillion plastic bags. Less than 1% of them would be recycled. Mass production of plastics began in the 1950s and the output has doubled every 15 years. It is estimated that 8.3 billion tonnes of plastic have been produced so far, out of which 6.3 billion tonnes have already ended up as waste. These astonishing statistics tell a sad story about the lifecycle of plastic products. Most plastic products have a short useful life and are not recycled. Since plastics will take 400 years to degrade, the problem is poised to escalate exponentially. The prediction that by mid-century, the oceans will contain more plastic waste than fish, ton for ton, has become one of the most-quoted scary statistics to galvanize us into action.

Perception

While we have to grudgingly accept a ban on plastic carry bags, it is also time to ask ourselves some important questions: What would have happened had the plastic carry bag had not been invented? How would much paper, and consequently trees and acreage of forests have been sacrificed? Would it have accelerated global warming? The “Plastic Ban” equates “plastic” with the “plastic bag” and has unfortunate consequences for the chemical industry, which is already held in low esteem by the public. The chemical industry has invented and manufactured many high-performance plastics with exceptional properties. Plastics are the most intensively engineered materials today. Take for instance the automobile industry. The average use of plastics per car is expected to increase from 200 kg in 2014 to 350 in 2020. As the world moves to autonomous electric vehicles the share of plastics will further increase as automakers compete to bring down the weight and raise the fuel efficiency of vehicles. Polypropylene, Polyurethane, and PVC are the three major plastics used by the automobile industry.

Applications

The construction industry is another prolific user of plastics. It is actually the second largest consumer of plastics, next to packaging. Polycarbonate window panes, polystyrene and polyurethane insulation, vinyl roofing membranes etc are contributing significantly to energy efficiency. A study found that 120 trillion kCal of energy has been saved in the USA by the use of plastics over alternative construction materials. Plastic forms the backbone of LEED certified “Green” Buildings. The commodity plastics market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 6.7% during the period 2018-2025

Another little-appreciated fact is the extensive use of plastics in prosthetics and orthoses.

Recycling

Unlike metals, plastics are not easy to recycle. There are too many varieties of plastics used in too many products. The collection and segregation make recycling a logistical nightmare. Plastic packaging, often contaminated with food, are difficult to recycle. Also, use of recycled plastic for food packaging is fraught with danger of contamination. There isn’t sufficient incentive to recycle plastics. The relatively low cost of plastics is a great barrier for its recycle and reuse. Reprocessing and reuse of plastics are not easy because of low consumer acceptance. There is a marked difference in the quality of products made from recycled plastics vis-à-vis virgin material. Fibres spun from recycled and reprocessed PET bottles don’t find application in premium fabrics. Notwithstanding this, ragpickers eke out a precarious livelihood recycling plastic bottles and bags. Presently only 10% of plastics are getting recycled and reprocessed.

Plastic to Oil

The most widely proposed solution to deal with the unrecycled plastics is to convert them into fuel. It has gained considerable traction in the last few years.  Many first-time entrepreneurs and start-up angels have passionately jumped into the fray, believing that they can save the planet and quickly make some bucks in the bargain. Different technologies are bandied around, as many as the number of plastics; but essentially, they all involve pyrolysis which breaks down the plastic molecules into pyrolysis oil, gas and Carbon Black. Pyrolysis happens at very high temperatures around 500 degrees C., but that has not stopped DIY kits from appearing on the internet. Plastics to Oil projects are plagued by economies of scale and unsteady availability of raw material.

Bioplastic

The first bioplastic, poly-3-hydroxybuturate (PHB), was discovered as early as 1925 by the French scientist Maurice Lemoigne. But his work remained unnoticed for several decades. Another popular bioplastic is Polylactide (PLA), which degrades within a year. PLA is biocompatible and can hence be used in biomedical applications, but outside of that, it has not found many applications. Bioplastics are currently languishing because of high production costs. Also, the present methods are based on feeding plastic-producing bacteria with sugar derived from crops. Scientists are now looking at genetic engineering to synthesize bioplastics more efficiently. It must be remembered that decomposition of biodegradable plastics produces methane, a major contributor to global warming. Waste management infrastructure has to provide for collecting this methane and using it as fuel.

Epilogue

The latest “Plastic Ban” is not a requiem for plastic. On the contrary, it is a clarion call for responsible use of this wonderful material that has enhanced the quality of our lives manifold. The chemical industry has to play a huge role in this through product stewardship. It also throws a challenge to invent and engineer a new generation of plastics that would not leave behind an ugly footprint.

Readers’ responses may be sent to k.sahasranaman@gmail.com or       chemindigest@gmail.com

Role of Academia in Industrial Developments

0

The word ‘academic’ often has a pejorative implication. The contribution of generations of academics in the development and dissemination of scientific, engineering and technical knowledge cannot be over-emphasized. Most of the industrial technologies owe their origins to contributions by academia. It should be noted that even the industry practitioners owe their education and training to academics. Most designers routinely refer to data, design methodologies and fundamental knowledge (e.g., thermodynamics, heat/mass transfer, advanced analytical and computational tools) generated and freely disseminated by academics working in a non-profit environment after careful peer review – also carried out voluntarily.

It is unfortunate that industry, as well as various government and granting agencies, do not give appropriate credit to the not-for-profit academic institutions and faculty members for their important impact on for-profit industrial technologies. The principal beneficiaries of the academic outcomes are industry and businesses, which take up ideas and knowledge germinated in educational institutions and research laboratories, develop them further and bring them to the market. Ultimately, the global society benefits from this joint effort of the non-profit institutions and for-profit businesses. Unfortunately, this synergy is often not recognized and appreciated in a tangible manner by the society in general. To promote academia-industry interaction in a mutually beneficial manner, it is important that governments, businesses, industry, and their relevant agencies provide for adequate support of educational and research institutions. In return, academia and research institutions must seek excellence and aim to make a definitive contribution to the society.

To sum, industry and granting agencies need to recognize the important role of academics and academia. It is naturally appropriate to expect that industry interacts tangibly with academia to extend the frontiers of current technologies. Rather than waiting for a random discovery or invention by an academic that could benefit some industrial product or process, albeit, without cost,  it is better than industry provides some direction and funding to accelerate development of knowledge that can benefit it sooner than later.

Research and Development are central to technological innovation which now drives knowledge-based economies of the world. Even a cursory look at investments various nations have made in R&D and higher education shows the direct link to their GDP growth. Advanced economies also demonstrate the success of cooperation between the public and private sectors to synergize research accrued out of academia with development effort of the industry. Without high-level research capabilities developed by academia in any nation, it is unlikely that any domestic industry can make truly innovative world-class technologies for lack of adequate financial resources and high-quality talent. Therefore, it is imperative that countries like India prioritize research in universities, R&D in industry and further promote academia-industry cooperation by encouraging it legislatively. The focus should be on developing high-end world-class technologies rather than licensing sometimes outdated technologies from overseas even if that formula works in the short term. For example, China ramped up their national R&D budget along with a massive increase in budgets for higher education and basic research over the past three decades; the results of this investment are already evident on the global scale.

Professor Arun S. Mujumdar is affiliated with Bioresource Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. He is Editor-in-Chief, Drying Technology – an international journal. He is the advisor to several universities and consults for industry internationally. 
E-mail: arunmujumdar123@gmail.com                                                                                                

DISCLAIMER : Views expressed above are the author’s own.

Chemingineering | Things on the Internet

 

Internet of Things (IoT) is generating a lot of hype. It will also generate a lot of data from billions of devices connected to each other. But do we have the capacity and ability to extract value out if it, asks our columnist? IoT will provide business intelligence only when integrated with Big Data analytics. Cybersecurity is a major threat to its widespread adoption in the Chemical Industry.

Internet of Things (IoT) is a concept in which objects with sensors embedded in them communicate with each other over the Internet. Gartner has predicted that IoT will connect 20 billion devices by 2020. Over 20 zettabytes (one trillion gigabytes) of data would be generated consequently. Do we have the capacity and more importantly the ability to extract meaningful information from this humungous amount of data? In the populist world of IoT, a refrigerator would directly place the order for milk or juices when the inventory goes down below a threshold level. Chemical industry professionals cannot but be amused by such examples, because this has been a routine in our industry for many decades now. Depletion of inventory in a tank or vessel is sensed by a level transmitter which then takes appropriate action; usually opening or closing a control valve. The transmitter and control valve are connected together by wires and cables and not through the Internet. The Internet has lowered connectivity costs to such an extent that 20 billion devices on IoT are no longer a pipedream.

Does the chemical industry know how to derive value from IoT generated data? Thought leaders in the industry ought to ask two tough questions:
a) Will IoT improve business processes to reduce costs and thus improve the bottom line?
b) Will IoT help in discovering new product applications and thus grow the top-line?          

Business Questions 

For IoT to succeed industrially, the emphasis has to shift from data gathering to data analysis. The additional data has to provide intelligence for improving business efficiencies or disrupting old business models. Does the chemical industry know how to derive value from IoT generated data? Thought leaders in the industry ought to ask two tough questions:
a) Will IoT improve business processes to reduce costs and thus improve the bottom line
b) Will IoT help in discovering new product applications and thus grow the top-line?
In the absence of clear-cut answers to the above two questions, IoT will continue to remain a thing of curiosity in IT seminars where mindless buzzwords like “end to end solution”, “massive scalability”, “deep learning” and “hybrid architecture” are bandied around. IoT should be driven by the industry and not by management consultants or IT companies.

Equipment Monitoring 

An easy to envisage application of IoT in the chemical industry is in equipment health monitoring. Equipment fitted with sensors will continuously transmit data about their health. These real-time data can be used for the timely intervention to prevent breakdown and extend the operating life of the equipment. This is not exactly a novel idea. Large process gas compressors are already equipped with Machine Monitoring Systems with temperature, vibration and displacement measurement probes that provide early warnings about a probable bearing failure. What IoT hopes to do with its low connectivity cost is to extend such health monitoring across the plant to a variety of equipment. A chemical plant has hundreds of valves and an IoT based system can monitor the health of each and every valve. Sensors mounted on positioners can monitor the hysteresis of control valves and provide suitable remedial action. All these data can be made available in real-time not just in the control room, but also at remote locations and even on handheld devices like a smartphone. Vendors can track the performance of machines and hardware supplied by them in real-time and make improvements for future. The obvious benefits are improved reliability and reduced downtime. Jet engine manufacturers like GE and Rolls Royce have already adopted such practices.

Data Analytics

IoT is not an end in itself; in order to be meaningful, it has to be coupled with data analytics.  By collecting a vast amount of data, much of it granular, IoT offers a huge scope for improving process efficiencies. The data gathered by IoT is large and diverse; it is Big Data. Getting business and process insight out of it requires good investment in Big Data analytics. Batch processing is a good example that can benefit from IoT integrated Big Data analytics. Pharmaceutical and speciality chemical companies usually have an ideal “Golden Batch” with perfect inputs and perfect process parameters. It is a challenge to replicate the perfect conditions of the “Golden Batch” batch after batch. IoT can facilitate this by real-time monitoring and tweaking of process parameters. Another application of IoT is in improved energy management. By dynamically monitoring the energy consumption of every single user in the plant, IoT can pave the way for energy savings through optimisation.

New Business Models

IoT is popularising the concept of Precision Agriculture in which inputs are tailormade to the needs of the crop, soil and weather with the objective of maximising the output. For example, a network of embedded sensors will record the moisture and micronutrient content of the soil. These data coupled with meteorological intelligence will determine the application of water and fertiliser. Micronutrients appropriate to the soil and the crop will be packaged with the fertiliser. Precision Agriculture needs chemical industry to adopt new business models in which fertilisers are no longer commodity chemicals priced on the weight basis, but performance chemicals priced on the outcome. IoT will play an important role in such a business model, in which the chemical industry works in close partnership with farmers
to provide solutions for increasing the farm output. IoT will help discover and develop similar customer-centric business models for other chemicals too.

IoT offers a huge scope for improving process efficiencies. The data gathered by IoT is large and diverse; it is Big Data. Getting business and process insight out of it requires good investment in Big Data analytics.

Cybersecurity

A serious obstacle to the widespread adoption of IoT by industry is cybersecurity. Internet networks can be hacked into by cybercriminals. Business intelligence and plant safety are a threat. Malfunctioning sensors can be embedded into equipment by a rogue supplier. The infamous Stuxnet, world’s first digital weapon, readily comes to mind. One way to improve the security of IoT is to implement it on a Blockchain platform. As explained in a previous column (Chemingineering, December 2017), Blockchain is a digital platform for exchanging data in a secure and transparent way. The convergence of IoT and Blockchain is however far from easy. IoT by definition has a centralised network; whereas decentralisation is the essence of Blockchain. The devices on an IoT network are low powered and may not be capable of running the encryption algorithms required for the security of Blockchain. Marrying IoT and Blockchain is one of the hottest R&D areas today.

Epilogue 

Chemical industry can be forgiven for being sceptical about the hype of IoT. Before investing in IoT chemical industry needs to have a clear understanding of the benefits that are likely to accrue. Investment in IoT has to be balanced with investment in Big Data analytics, else there is a real danger of being inundated with irrelevant information. If IoT is the hardware, Big Data analytics is the software that runs on it. Presently only management consultants and IT companies are making noise on the Internet about IoT. Major players in the industry are keeping the cards close to their chest.

Readers’ responses may be sent to

k.sahasranaman@gmail.com or
chemindigest@gmail.com

Making complex softwares simpler and easier to handle for wider use in hydrocarbon and downstream chemical industries — AspenTech motto

Competition is rife in any sector of the industry today, whether it is in hydrocarbons or in downstream fine chemicals. Every industry is trying to maximise their productivity and profitability, as well as produce more with less. The challenges, increase the complexity of the plants in industries, such as oil & gas, refineries, petrochemicals, and fertilizers. Operational excellence, optimum plant health, process efficiencies, energy efficiencies, safety, troubleshooting have all become crucial for success in the marketplace. 

Digital technologies, advanced computing and high-end software, data analytics and internet have all converged to provide powerful tools for operators in hydrocarbon and downstream chemical industries to deploy for achieving the above-stated objectives. 

AspenTech is a leading company offering a suite of software solutions including modelling and simulations to arm the process operators with virtually all the tools required for any functional area in a process plant.

Chemical Industry Digest had a one-hour long interaction with Ron Beck, Director of Industry marketing, Energy at AspenTech on his recent trip to India. Along with Beck was Sunil Patil, Business Consulting Director, India of AspenTech.

Excerpts from the interview:

Chemical Industry Digest (CID): What is the story behind the name AspenTech? How did it come about?
Ron: To meet the challenges of the oil crisis in the 1970s, the US government roped in professors from MIT, other leading Universities, leading companies like Dow, DuPont, etc. to create computer models for coal gasification. This research project was named ASPEN –Advanced Simulation for Process Engineering, which became publicly available. Later a company was formed named ASPEN Technologies which started selling a better software version called AspenPlus. The founder of this company was Larry Evans from MIT, who was a genius in understanding industry needs. He decided to acquire and put together several software products, starting from dynamic simulation to a suite of products, that could solve business and industry problems. Larry had the vision to assemble all the pieces of software that existed and connect them together. The basic concept was based on models and data. As we evolved we would have a comprehensive set of models for all areas of oil & gas to chemical plants. We are still on this journey though now with tremendous amounts of data available, we are combining models with data analytics to offer advanced solutions for industry.

CID: What industries do you serve and which segment contributes the maximum to your revenue?
Ron: If you look at our business profile today, we serve three key industries. First of which, is the oil and gas industry, which includes upstream and refining. The other two industry groups include chemicals and engineering, which includes mostly engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) companies. The rest would be spread into smaller segments such as electric power, mining, and pharma. Chemicals would include petrochemicals as well as fine chemicals. World’s two largest petrochemical companies, Dow Chemicals, and SABIC are both large users of our software and so are the two largest specialty chemical companies, Evonik and BASF.


Ron Beck, Director of Industry Marketing, Energy, at AspenTech has been responsible for marketing the Engineering & Construction sector, the Engineering product portfolio, Aspen Economic Evaluation and Aspen Basic Engineering software. Beck has well over two decades of experience in evangelizing software solutions to process industries and over a decade of experience in commercializing chemical engineering technology. He has authored papers on key industry topics and had presented at several public industry events. Beck is a graduate of Princeton University in New Jersey in the US.

CID: Is your R&D and main software development only in the US or elsewhere too?
Ron: Our main software development is in the US. We have software products that we have purchased from other companies too. We also have a software development centre in Shanghai. A lot of focus today on new generation users is on digital transformation, which is essentially making complex tools more usable and consumable to everybody in a company. For this, we made our softwares more usable. We have two layers to our software: the core models and then the usability layers. A lot of this usability development is done in Shanghai. Usability is more than user friendliness; it is making our new generation process simulation tools work on various platforms.

CID: Considering that you have a wide range of customers in different geographies, how do you address the challenge of customisation?
Ron: Customisation has evolved over the years. Earlier when we came up with a software we used to release multiple versions with extensions so that different customers could use it. Then later we came up with Application Programming Interfaces so that when we customise into a new version it won’t break what has already been running. We are also working with the National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST), a US government research organisation to facilitate customisations. The biggest customisation area for chemical processes is the physical properties. NIST with whom we have an agreement collates all physical property data of various work done in research labs, using our software,
ASPEN Properties. Based on utilising all this we have built different systems based on end-use areas and functions. For chemicals we have AspenPlus software; for oil & gas, our system is Aspen HYSYS software. We have also integrated the two products, so both the chemical and
oil & gas industries can use them. We have also developed the Aspen Assay Manager functionality that can extend across different systems, mainly for oil companies. Our refinery planning systems software for chemicals and oil & gas can both access the same database. We have also tied up with the Italian oil company ENI – one of the largest oil companies, to obtain physical properties which as I said is the biggest area – that helps us in customisation.

We have built different systems based on end-
use areas and functions. For chemicals we
have AspenPlus software; for oil & gas, our
system is Aspen HYSYS software. We have also
integrated the two products, so both the chemical
and oil & gas industries can use them. We
have also developed the Aspen Assay Manager
functionality that can extend across different
systems, mainly for oil companies.

CID: We understand that process simulation is a major area for you?
Ron: Yes. Another major area we are in is process simulation, which has moved far beyond being used only for the design of plants due to the developments in powerful computing and software. Therefore, today’s simulation models are more robust, can also be used online. Simulation helps in providing solutions, like the one we have built for preheater trains – which is beginning to be popular in India. This preheater train simulation software is very important to address energy use and efficiencies. Another area to address is heat exchanger fouling. As you know heat exchangers get fouled and the efficiency of the process goes down. A huge decision in a refinery is how often to shut down a heat exchanger for cleaning. We provide such solutions.

CID: Many users get little intimidated working on sophisticated software. How do you address that?
Ron: We have a group who are working on 40 different solutions to give people simple models. Since orienting manpower to complex software is not easy, we have started guides, which is relatively easy for new engineers to build let’s say a preheat train for a refinery, which can be done without many years of experience. You see many people fear software like PINCH analysis, for instance. So, we try to make our software simpler and easy to handle. Our challenge is how to get people to use it. One of our big projects over the
years was first to try and simplify the user interface and secondly to make it same between different products. For example, if you have learnt to use our modelling software, then you can use our energy software easily as it isn’t a lot different. You don’t have to go and
learn a whole different system when it comes to using our different products. So, we have been innovating to make our solutions accessible to more and more people. We call this the democratisation of the tools. The other thing we did was to build complete integration between energy analysis, PINCH analysis and our process modelling tools. So, you can build the process model and run the pinch analysis without even having to know how to do PINCH.

CID: What about your operations in India?
Sunil: In India, we have our marketing office in Pune where we also do consult and providing services. We customise our offerings for the end user. In India particularly, we provide many solutions, beyond Aspen Plus software. One area where we do a lot of work in India is in energy management. Like Preheat train optimisation which is done typically using technology like PINCH analysis. We also offer solutions for plant utility optimisation. Where there are multiple boilers, steam turbines etc, it helps to decide what should be the efficiency of boilers, its capacity, how it should operate etc. It is both supply side as well as the demand-side optimisation. We have done this successfully at BPCL, Mumbai. We see many such opportunities not only in the public-sector refineries but also in private ones like Reliance and Essar. In these refineries, we are not only looking at energy but also solutions for safety, for integrations into petrochemicals, for further optimising feedstocks etc. The refinery sector has contributed the maximum to the growth of AspenTech in India. We collaborate with Indian educational institutes like IITs and even regional engineering colleges for various activities. We also have the university specific software.

Sunil Patil is the Director of Business Consulting for Engineering in Asia Pacific at AspenTech. Sunil manages a team of business consultants to support sales with a high level of client engagement. With more than 18 years of experience at AspenTech, he covers a broad range of industries, such as oil and gas, refining, chemicals, engineering, and construction, as well pharmaceuticals. He has a masters’ degree in chemical engineering from Shivaji  University.

CID: Can your current generation of products work on older refineries/plants?
Ron: As you know in the US no one has built a new refinery in the past 30 years or so. Despite that, they are some of the heaviest users of our solutions. There is a lot of data in the new plants and in the old plants also there is more data than what people think. We got to figure out how to use them. When data is less like in older plants we can use models to calculate them and create data points. Our Aspen OnLine software can do this – which is an automated workflow. Where there are limited data points like in an old refinery and one needs to know some of the parameters of the working equipment like saying heat exchangers or compressors, we can run the model and calculate these parameters by running it on calibration mode. Once this data is available from the calibrated model, you can take the dataset and run it in ‘solution mode’. So, things like this can be done with every old
plant; the key is to figure out which places in the plant it is going to have an impact. So instead of trying to do this everywhere in the plant which may not be feasible, we can pick out the highest impact areas – like a certain reactor or a column or a preheat area – where there is some trouble or limitation to get the data points and offer it to operators. This helps even when you are trying to reconfigure a refinery, like in India where they are moving towards BSVI norms. AspenTech’s software solutions can be used to redesign some of the refineries/plants and reconfigure existing systems. We focus on trying to help people select the big impact areas where you can have a business benefit so that you can succeed in a reasonable time frame. The company should work on those areas which are challenging.

CID: What are your other offerings? 
Ron: We do a lot of work in the predictive maintenance area using not just data coming off a pump (for instance) for vibration, but data coming out of the entire process to understand how the process is interacting with the equipment, to understand what really is causing the problem in the plant. This can give information well in advance, that the plant or equipment is being run the wrong way and that this is going to wear out the equipment unless the way of operating is changed. We have acquired a company, Mtell to combine their machine learning technology with our expertise with process models. Combining this we are already marketing a software for predictive maintenance. This software can tell you about 2 to 3 months ahead of time that there is a problem in an equipment, and not just 2 to 3 weeks ahead like in conventional software. This is because this software uses lot more sophisticated footprints in the data. We have already merged this software with our solution in column modelling area where we have a very sophisticated column model by taking all the data available from a column and feeding it into the model so that it provides much better insights on how to operate.

We do a lot of work in the predictive maintenance area using not just data coming off a pump (for instance) for vibration, but data coming out of the entire process to understand how the process is interacting with the equipment, to understand what really is causing the problem in the plant. This can give information well in advance, that the plant or equipment is being run the wrong way and that this is going to wear out the equipment unless the way of operating is changed.

CID: Do you also have software for biorefineries?
Sunil: The Aspen Plus software has modelling capabilities for biorefineries. The US Department of Energy has a lot of published information on various models that are open to the public in the biorefining area. A lot of their research used Aspen Plus software and they published the reference models. People can download them and use for advanced bioprocessing.

Aluminium – Once elusive, now a prized metal

Behind every element are stories on how it was discovered, on the scientists behind the element and the stories on its amazing developments and applications. This feature will bring you very interesting and not widely known nuggets behind every element. Do you know that once upon a time just when Aluminium was discovered, it was costlier than gold and silver?So much so that the royalty in France and elsewhere considered aluminium plates and cutlery to be used only by the Royals and not the commoners. Continuous and successive developments in extracting aluminium from widely available ores crashed its price and brought it down to earth. Read these interesting tales on aluminium.

It’s strange but true. Unlike other metals like copper, gold, silver, lead, and iron that man has been familiar with for thousands of years, the existence of aluminium, the most abundant metal in the earth’s crust, was unknown to us till just around two centuries ago. The reason was that aluminium is one of the most chemically reactive metals and hence, not found in its metallic form in nature, occurring naturally only in the form of its compounds in rocks, soil, and vegetation, bauxite being its principal ore.

The first methods developed in the early 1800s for separating aluminium from its ore were so costly that for several decades afterwards, it continued to be a rare and expensive metal costing much more than precious metals like gold and silver. So much so, that in the 1860s, the French Emperor Napoleon III had a cutlery set of aluminium made especially for entertaining his most important guests. The others had to use tableware made of silver.

At that time, aluminium cost over $ 500/lb. But guess what? Just 50 years later, its price plummeted to less than half a dollar for a pound. What brought about the dramatic change was an innovative, cheaper method for producing pure aluminium developed simultaneously, but independently, in the US and France by two young scientists. Their momentous achievement is the reason why today, we can see aluminium in use almost everywhere, from kitchen utensils to high-rise buildings, and from aeroplanes down to cans for packaging aerated drinks.

Around that time, in his novel ‘From the Earth to the Moon’ (1865) about humankind’s imaginary, pioneering attempt to send man to the moon, Jules Verne wrote that the material he chose for building his space capsule was aluminium, and described it as ‘a valuable metal’ possessing ‘the whiteness of silver, the indestructibility of gold, the tenacity of iron, the fusibility of copper, the lightness of glass’.

An interesting history

While the existence of aluminium remained hidden till recently, its compounds were known to humans for millennia. Alum (aluminium potassium sulphate), one of its most important compounds, was used even by ancient civilizations. The Romans used it as an astringent for healing cuts and as a mordant for dyeing cloth. The Turks used it to make a dye called Turkey Red. Ancient potters in Persia and elsewhere used clays rich in aluminium silicates.

Slowly, over time, chemists realised alum could contain a new element. Between 1807 and 1809, the English chemist Sir Humphrey Davy, who had already separated elements like sodium and potassium by electrolysing their molten compounds, tried unsuccessfully to isolate aluminium by electrolysing fused alumina (aluminium oxide). But, he wasn’t the only one to have failed. For several decades before him, many other scientists across Europe including Lavoisier, who was keen on discovering the mysterious element in alum, had also tried to accomplish the difficult task of separating aluminium from its compounds. But aluminium continued to defy all attempts at extracting it. However, Davy understood compounds of other metals enough to be sure that alum was the salt of some till then unknown metal. In 1808, he even suggested this metal could be called alumium and after a couple of years modified this to aluminium. British scientists later decided on the name aluminium.

German chemist Friedrich Wöhler tried reducing aluminium chloride using potassium metal as the reducing agent, producing a small quantity of aluminium powder in 1827, and in 1845 a few small globules of the silvery metal, enough for him to carry out some basic research on it. Scientists were excited by its sparkle, but more than that, by its amazing lightness. However, Wöhler’s method of extraction was too costly for putting the metal to commercial use.

Realising the significance of finding an inexpensive way of isolating aluminium, European chemists continued research in this direction. One of them, French chemist Henri Sainte-Claire Deville found a way of producing a larger quantity of aluminium in 1854 by reducing aluminium chloride with sodium, a much cheaper metal than potassium. A year later, aluminium bars were exhibited to the public at the Paris Exposition alongside the French crown jewels as ‘the silver from clay’. With the commencement of smallscale industrial production of aluminium, in a few years, its price dropped to around $40/lb.

Soon, more of aluminium’s alluring properties became known besides its low density, such as its high tensile strength and malleability, excellent thermal and electrical conductivity, and its incredible resistance to corrosion. Around that time, in his novel ‘From the Earth to the Moon’ (1865) about humankind’s imaginary, pioneering attempt to send man to the moon, Jules Verne wrote that the material he chose for building his space capsule was aluminium, and described it as ‘a valuable metal’ possessing ‘the whiteness of silver, the indestructibility of gold, the tenacity of iron, the fusibility of copper, the lightness of glass’.

Deville’s method, however, was still not suited for large-scale production of aluminium as the quality of the metal was not good enough and the production costs were still high. Then, in 1886, two 23- year old researchers – the American, Charles M. Hall, and Frenchman, Paul L. T. Héroult, changed things around by achieving the desired breakthrough that more experienced scientists had been struggling to pull off for decades.

Aluminium can also be easily melted, recovered and recycled with no loss of its original qualities and by using a very low amount of energy. Being 100% recyclable, aluminium can be re-used over and over again indefinitely, making it an environment-friendly metal.

Historic breakthrough by Hall and Héroult 

Hall, studying at Oberlin College in Oberlin, Ohio, used rudimentary, homemade equipment, working in a woodshed in his backyard and his college lab to carry out experiments for finding a cheaper way of producing aluminium. Around the same time in Paris, Héroult, a former engineering student at the School of Mines, also keenly interested in the problem of reducing the price of aluminium, was carrying out experiments of his own. It is believed that Hall’s interest in aluminium was deepened even further after attending a lecture by Frank Jewett, his chemistry professor. Jewett had let his students examine a lump of aluminium he owned and told them that “if anyone should invent a process by which aluminium could be made on a commercial scale, not only would he be a benefactor to the world, but would also be able to lay up for himself a great fortune”. Héroult was similarly influenced by his own chemistry professor Henry Le Chatelier, well respected for his knowledge about aluminium.

Working independently, Hall and Héroult found that if alumina was dissolved in molten cryolite (sodium aluminium fluoride) it could be reduced to aluminium electrolytically. Both of them filed for a patent of their production process in 1886. Their discovery led to the price of aluminium plunging to $ 0.40/lb! However, another discovery too played a significant role in this development. In 1888, the Austrian chemist Karl Joseph Bayer found a cheaper way of obtaining alumina, the raw material for the Hall-Héroult the process, from bauxite. Thus, the inexpensive methods of extracting aluminium oxide from bauxite, and aluminium from aluminium oxide led to the start of the era of cheap aluminium. Till today, the Hall-Héroult and Bayer processes are used for producing almost all of the world’s annual production of millions of tonnes of aluminium.

Interestingly, Hall and Héroult not only discovered and patented their processes in the same year, they also shared the same birth year (1863), and died in the same year (1914) too, just a few days apart from each other.

The metal of the future 

As Jules Verne had foreseen, aluminium has proved to be a boon for air and space travel. Modern-day aircraft and spacecraft use aluminium alloys extensively for different parts.

Aluminium plays a key role in sea and road transportation as well. Since the last few years, automobile manufacturers like General Moros, Ford, and Jaguar Land Rover have increased their demand for aluminium for manufacturing lighter vehicles. Lighter car bodies translate into higher fuel efficiency, better acceleration and braking, and also ensure lower carbon emissions. Aluminium’s corrosion resistance is another plus point as it eliminates the need for expensive anti-corrosion paints that steel car bodies need. Experts say the average aluminium content in a car could increase by 60% by around 2025. Today, aluminium is also used in Japanese and Chinese high-speed trains for reducing their weight and friction resistance.

Aluminium products used in building construction ensures the buildings are maintenance- free, and thermally more efficient. New York City’s Empire State Building was the first skyscraper in which aluminium was widely used. Today, aluminium products are commonly used for constructing high-rise buildings and bridges. The use of aluminium significantly reduces the construction cost as heavier steel-made buildings need much deeper foundations. Today’s smartphones, laptops, and flat-screen TVs too are manufactured with a higher amount of aluminium as it prevents them from overheating.

Aluminium can also be easily melted, recovered and recycled with no loss of its original qualities and by using a very low amount of energy. Being 100% recyclable, aluminium can be re-used over and over again indefinitely, making it an environment-friendly metal. According to many experts, someday in the future, we may stop mining bauxite and just keep re-using the aluminium we already have.

References:

1. Azom.com: Aluminium, The History, Discovery and Development as a Product – AZo Materials, 20 July 2002, https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=1530

2. John Emsley: Aluminium – Education in Chemistry, Royal Society of Chemistry, 7 January 2014

3. Laurence Knight, Tim Bowler: Aluminium: The metal that just keeps on giving – BBC Magazine, 23 November 2013

4. Daniel Rabinovich: The allure of aluminium – Nature Chemistry, 18 December 2012

5. Stephanie Pappas: Facts about Aluminium – https://www.livescience.com/28865-aluminum.html, 28 September 28, 2014

6. Tom Geller: Aluminum: Common Metal, Uncommon Past -Distillations Magazine, Winter 2007–2008

7. Gregory H. Robinson: Aluminum – C&EN, 8 September 2003.

Advertisement

Newsletter

Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter & Stay Updated

Advertisement